Cathy Brennan, radical “feminist” terrorist, has set her sights on a young black activist in Baltimore County, MD. Phylicia Sampson is being taken to court by Brennan, a notorious harasser of trans women and their supporters. Sampson is a recent college grad with few resources, no car and no way to fight back without your help.
As a community, we’ve suffered Brennan’s assaults for a long time—her blog is the best known for outing trans women’s personal information. She believes trans women are men who are infiltrating the feminist community and expends her resources fighting them. The idea that she is now taking her harassment to a legal venue is horrifying. That she has selected a young black woman with few resources to fight back is repugnant.
We can’t let Cathy Brennan get away with this! Share Phylicia’s campaign on Facebook, twitter, tumblr and instagram. Here are some things you can do TODAY to help:
Tell your friends why it is important that they donate to this campaign.
Donate what you can.
Write to your favorite feminist blog and ask them to cover this campaign
BUT THE BUGS THING (the picture is of a spider not an insect but w/e) WOULDN’T HAPPEN IMMEDIATELY (like I assume the no oxygen consequences would?) and there would probably be way more immediate concerns like probably EXPLOSIONS?
Because homeless people can’t afford property tax or house payments. I’m sorry but I really would rather a house be empty than just given away. It does need to be paid for by someone.
Are you fucking serious I wanna see you be homeless and then tell me that empty houses should stay empty
BOOOOOOOOO, fuck that guy. When you were putting your head up your ass to type that did it occur to you that empty houses don’t generate any fucking revenue either? Property taxes and home payments ain’t getting made if the house is empty. fuck you so hard dude
Do we not take in to account that many of these homes are potential income makers for the owners? I’m sure these statistics are based off of homes for rent also, that if given to a homeless person to use, lose the potential income gained from either renting it or leaving it vacant. Because a homeless person cannot afford that bills or property taxes to begin with, the owner is losing income. Giving these homes away would result in an overall decrease of income for more people than it benefits, in plain terms. I’m not looking at this from any other viewpoint than economical though. I’m not saying that homeless people don’t deserve homes, just that they don’t deserve homes paid for by other people.
In other words: Wealth > Homelessness
Who gives a fuck about the owners? They’re the one’s contributing the most to homelessness by hoarding property for the purpose of profit. We could literally abolish homelessness if it wasn’t for them and the capitalist system that values private property over human lives.
Yes, because capitalism is the root cause of all evil in this world. *rolls eyes* There’s absolutely no irony in a person using an electronic device to criticize private property rights on a social networking site. None at all.
I find it even more ironic that a supporter or private property cannot recognize the difference between personal and private property.
(white) Men seem to think that what they say is so ~~objective and ~~unbiased, but dude, trust me on this one, you only feel that way because of a lifetime of conditioning telling you that you’re the default and everyone else is just a special interest group.